Prediction of Thiemo de Bakker [846th] vs John Peers [734th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W L L L L LH2H: Bakker 1 - 0 Peers
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bakker winning 2 and Peers winning 0. The last match between Bakker and Peers was at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, 17-08-2013, Q1 round, Hard with Thiemo de Bakker getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Thiemo de Bakker | 1 |
| John Peers | 0 |
| Bakker | Stats | Peers |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-1) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 846 | Ranking | 734 |
| 40 | Highest Rank | 456 |
| 36 | Age | 36 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 60% (453-296) | Career Total W/L | 57% (55-41) |
| $785,940 | Career Prize Money | $1,425 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
John Peers
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 7 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 0:51:35 | Average Match Time | 0:51:35 |
| 51% (24/47) | 1st Serve % | 67% (40/60) |
| 75% (18/24) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (27/40) |
| 74% (17/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 20% (4/20) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 26% (12/47) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thiemo de Bakker vs John Peers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bakker 1 - 0 Peers
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Peers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Peers winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bakker winning 1 times and Peers being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bakker winning 2 and Peers winning 0. The last match between Bakker and Peers was at the Winston-Salem Open - Winston-Salem, 17-08-2013, Q1 round, Hard with Thiemo de Bakker getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:51:35.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bakker and Peers have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bakker winning 0 times and Peers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bakker winning 0, and Peers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Peers has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Thiemo de Bakker vs John Peers Best Odds For The Match
Thiemo de Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
John Peers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(4) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
Player
John Peers
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
91)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
26%
(
22 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(4) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stephane Robert
Player
John Peers
51%
(
57 of
111)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
89)
0
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
2
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
47 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
105
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
John Peers
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
5
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
6
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Haase
Player
John Peers
69%
(
54 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John Peers
Player
Artur Completo
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
60 of
83)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
37 of
60)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Luka Gregorc
Player
John Peers
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
John Peers
Player
Michael Yani
52%
(
44 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
12
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Bakker vs Peers?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Bakker Vs Peers is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (453/296) | Win/Loss | 57% (55/41) |
| 0% (0/0) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (120/93) |
| 0% (0/0) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (1093/964) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 0 | Aces Total | 177 |
| 0 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 72 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 0 | Average Opponent Rank | 61.96 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1246/1996) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (883/1246) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (362/750) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (53/162) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 36% (707/1981) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (53/94) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (15/38) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (54/49) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (54/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (42/5) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
